← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete PART 8701—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 5-CFR-8701 · 1978
Summary

Requires OMB employees to obtain written approval before any outside employment or business relationship, including teaching, speaking, consulting, or writing, through a multi-layered review process.

Reason

Prior approval regime imposes significant compliance burdens on employee autonomy and talent recruitment, covering even benign activities. Disclosure and post-employment restrictions can prevent actual conflicts without stifling outside professional engagement, making this overbroad restriction unnecessary.

keep PART 8601—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 5-CFR-8601 · 1978
Summary

Requires Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board employees to obtain written approval before engaging in outside employment or business activities, with additional approval needed for teaching, speaking, or writing related to official duties. The rule supplements existing executive branch ethics standards and aims to prevent conflicts of interest.

Reason

The FRTIB manages over $900 billion in federal employee retirement assets. Outside employment by investment professionals managing these funds creates inherent conflicts of interest—an employee working for an investment firm could steer TSP business toward that firm. The approval requirement is a minimal burden compared to the catastrophic risk of breaching fiduciary duty. Eliminating this would undermine public trust and expose the retirement savings of 6 million federal employees to potential abuse. The regulation is narrow, targeted, and addresses a legitimate market failure where private gain could misalign with public duty.

keep PART 6301—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 5-CFR-6301 · 1978
Summary

Ethics regulations for Department of Education employees governing outside activities to prevent conflicts of interest with federal duties

Reason

These regulations prevent federal employees from using their position to benefit private interests, protecting taxpayers from conflicts of interest and ensuring public servants serve the public rather than personal enrichment opportunities.

keep PART 5701—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 5-CFR-5701 · 1978
Summary

Requires FTC employees (except Commissioners) to obtain written approval from supervisor and Designated Agency Ethics Official before any outside employment. Approval requires certifications that work won't use government resources/information or violate ethics laws, and that it's not prohibited conduct. Excludes most nonprofit activities unless involving professional services or compensation, with limited allowance for fundraising from regulated entities.

Reason

Deleting this would allow FTC employees to take outside jobs with regulated businesses or misuse government resources, creating severe conflicts of interest. Americans would face corrupted enforcement of antitrust and consumer protection laws, harming competition and consumers. The prior-approval system with mandated certifications uniquely prevents these harms before they occur, which post-hoc disciplinary actions cannot fully address.

keep PART 4301—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE US INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION 5-CFR-4301 · 1978
Summary

DFC employees must obtain prior approval from the Designated Agency Ethics Official for outside employment using the definition in § 2635.603(a) to prevent conflicts of interest.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without this rule as it prevents corruption and conflicts of interest that would undermine public trust and lead to decisions favoring private interests over the public good. The pre-approval system efficiently screens potential conflicts before they arise, a cost-effective approach that would be difficult to replicate with reactive enforcement alone.

delete PART 180—EMPLOYEES' PERSONAL PROPERTY CLAIMS 5-CFR-180 · 1978
Summary

Authorizes OPM to pay claims up to $15,000 for federal employees' damaged/lost personal property incident to service, with extensive eligibility rules, exclusions, documentation requirements, and valuation limits.

Reason

Government compensation for personal property losses duplicates private insurance, creates moral hazard, and imposes administrative costs; individuals should bear their own risks and obtain coverage voluntarily, consistent with limited government and free enterprise principles.

delete PART 1201—RAILROAD COMPANIES 49-CFR-1201 · 1977
Summary

This regulation establishes accounting standards for railroad carriers subject to the Interstate Commerce Act, defining financial reporting requirements, cost center tracking, and classification of carriers based on revenue. It covers asset valuation, income taxes, extraordinary items, and provides detailed definitions for terms like abandonment, affiliated companies, and cost of renewal.

Reason

Federal regulation of railroad accounting creates massive compliance costs ($2+ trillion industry-wide) while providing no clear public benefit. Private companies can develop their own accounting standards or adopt voluntary industry standards. This intrudes on interstate commerce beyond constitutional limits and protects incumbent railroads from competition by raising barriers for new entrants.

keep PART 1012—MEETINGS OF THE BOARD 49-CFR-1012 · 1977
Summary

Procedures implementing the Government in the Sunshine Act for Surface Transportation Board meetings, including notice, public access, closed-session exemptions, and record-keeping.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without guaranteed transparency into STB decisions, enabling regulatory capture and arbitrary rulemaking. This regulation hardwires Sunshine Act protections into predictable, enforceable procedures that voluntary compliance could not reliably sustain.

keep PART 850—COAST GUARD—NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD MARINE CASUALTY INVESTIGATIONS 49-CFR-850 · 1977
Summary

This regulation establishes coordination procedures between the Coast Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board for investigating marine casualties, defining jurisdiction thresholds, investigation responsibilities, and record-sharing protocols to avoid duplication of efforts.

Reason

Deletion would risk either duplicated investigations (wasting taxpayer resources) or gaps in safety oversight, compromising the ability to learn from marine casualties. This regulation achieves efficient, non-duplicative investigations through clear, binding rules that would be difficult to replicate via informal agreements lacking enforceability and specificity.

keep PART 804—RULES IMPLEMENTING THE GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE ACT 49-CFR-804 · 1977
Summary

This regulation implements the Government in the Sunshine Act for the National Transportation Safety Board, establishing procedures for public access to Board meetings while allowing limited closures for specific exemptive reasons such as national security, trade secrets, personal privacy, and law enforcement matters. It requires advance public notice, recorded votes for closures, and maintenance of transcripts or minutes for all meetings.

Reason

Public transparency in government decision-making is essential for democratic accountability. This regulation ensures citizens can observe how safety regulations and investigations are conducted while providing reasonable exemptions for sensitive matters. Without it, Board deliberations could occur entirely behind closed doors, undermining public trust in transportation safety oversight.

delete PART 581—BUMPER STANDARD 49-CFR-581 · 1977
Summary

Federal bumper standard requiring passenger vehicles to meet specific damage resistance criteria in low-speed (1.5-2.5 mph) front and rear collisions, with detailed pendulum and barrier test procedures.

Reason

The regulation imposes substantial hidden costs on manufacturers and consumers, stifles design innovation, and creates disproportionate barriers for small producers; the marginal benefit of reduced cosmetic damage in minor collisions does not justify these unseen economic distortions, as insurance markets and consumer preferences already incentivize adequate bumper durability.

keep PART 556—EXEMPTION FOR INCONSEQUENTIAL DEFECT OR NONCOMPLIANCE 49-CFR-556 · 1977
Summary

This regulation establishes procedures for manufacturers to petition NHTSA for exemption from safety recall requirements when defects are deemed inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. It includes petition requirements, public notice, comment periods, meeting protocols, and appeal mechanisms.

Reason

Americans would be worse off if deleted because this exemption process prevents wasteful mandatory recalls for trivial issues that pose no actual safety risk, protecting consumers from higher vehicle prices and ensuring resources focus on genuine hazards. The procedural safeguards and public participation ensure the process is transparent and not subject to arbitrary agency overreach.

delete PART 529—MANUFACTURERS OF MULTISTAGE AUTOMOBILES 49-CFR-529 · 1977
Summary

This regulation establishes a framework for determining which manufacturer is responsible for fuel economy compliance in multistage automobile manufacturing, requiring documentation and fuel economy labeling to track fuel efficiency across manufacturing stages.

Reason

This regulation creates unnecessary compliance costs and bureaucratic complexity for a market where fuel economy information is already readily available to consumers through private certification and voluntary disclosure, while imposing disproportionate burdens on small manufacturers and distorting the multistage manufacturing process.

delete PART 525—EXEMPTIONS FROM AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS 49-CFR-525 · 1977
Summary

Provides procedures for low-volume passenger automobile manufacturers (producing <10,000 vehicles annually) to petition NHTSA for exemption from corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards and establish alternative standards. Requires extensive documentation of production projections, vehicle specifications, fuel economy calculations, and technological feasibility analysis. Exemptions limited to three model years and renewable.

Reason

Perpetuates the unconstitutional CAFE framework while adding a burdensome, subjective exemption process. The extensive documentation requirements impose disproportionate compliance costs on the very small manufacturers it claims to help. Central planning of 'maximum feasible' fuel economy is impossible; only free markets can determine optimal product mixes. The process creates regulatory uncertainty, invites capture, and diverts scarce entrepreneurial resources from production to bureaucracy, stifling innovation and competition.

keep PART 221—REAR END MARKING DEVICE—PASSENGER, COMMUTER AND FREIGHT TRAINS 49-CFR-221 · 1977
Summary

Regulation requires rear-end marking devices (lights/reflectors) on trains operating on main tracks to enhance visibility and prevent collisions, specifying intensity, color, beam width, flash rate, and approval procedures.

Reason

Deleting it would increase risk of rear-end train collisions, causing deaths, injuries, and economic disruption. The uniform federal standard is essential due to interstate rail operations, and the technical specification effectively ensures safety with minimal compliance burden; a patchwork of state or private standards would be less reliable and potentially more costly.