← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete PART 2830—COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 48-CFR-2830 · 2022
Summary

This regulation mandates that only the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) may determine invalid costs under FAR 30.201-5, prohibiting delegation below senior contract policymaking level.

Reason

Unnecessary centralization that creates bureaucratic bottlenecks, reduces agency operational flexibility, and adds hidden costs through inefficiency without proven benefit over allowing agencies to set appropriate delegation levels internally.

keep PART 2829—TAXES 48-CFR-2829 · 2022
Summary

DOJ regulation governing federal tax immunity for government purchases and leases. It prohibits contract clauses designating contractors as government agents for tax avoidance while establishing a review process for limited cases where agent status may be granted for sales/use tax immunity claims.

Reason

Without this restriction, federal contractors could broadly claim government agent status to evade state and local taxes, undermining state fiscal autonomy and creating unfair competitive advantages. The regulation preserves legitimate sovereign immunity for direct federal purchases while preventing abuse that would shift tax burdens to other businesses and citizens, and reduce essential state/local revenue for public services.

delete PART 2828—BONDS AND INSURANCE 48-CFR-2828 · 2022
Summary

This regulation outlines procedural requirements for federal procurement, including authorization levels for surety bond waivers, collateral eligibility standards for individual sureties (requiring assets to meet 31 CFR part 225 and be held by Treasury), and approval processes for contractor group insurance plans under cost-reimbursement contracts.

Reason

These procedural requirements impose administrative burdens that increase contracting costs and delay timelines without commensurate benefit. The mandatory review of group insurance plans creates unnecessary barriers and subjectivity. Collateral management via Treasury custody adds complexity disproportionate to the risk mitigation provided, potentially excluding small contractors who cannot navigate the red tape. The regime exemplifies the 'administrative state' expanding beyond constitutional constraints, with no clear statutory basis for such detailed prescriptiveness.

delete PART 2827—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS 48-CFR-2827 · 2022
Summary

This regulation designates the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) as the agency head with authority under FAR 27.303(e)(4) regarding patent rights and march-in decisions for government-funded inventions.

Reason

Maintaining this internal delegation in the CFR adds to regulatory bloat and creates a dedicated bureaucratic position, increasing costs without public benefit. Such administrative details belong in agency manuals, contributing to the $2 trillion annual compliance burden.

delete PART 2825—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 48-CFR-2825 · 2022
Summary

Delegates authority to agency officials (HCA or designee) to make specific determinations under FAR Part 25, including Buy American Act compliance decisions, exceptions for domestic construction materials, and referrals of potential fraud to OIG.

Reason

Purely internal delegation implementing Buy American restrictions that distort markets, increase procurement costs, and violate free trade principles. Such procedural matters belong in agency guidance, not the Code of Federal Regulations.

delete PART 2823—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 48-CFR-2823 · 2022
Summary

Federal procurement regulations requiring preference for ENERGY STAR/FEMP/EPEAT-certified products and recycled-content goods when price/performance/availability are equal, plus certification requirements and hazardous material contract clauses.

Reason

Procurement preferences distort markets, increase costs, and create barriers for small businesses through complex certification burdens. Government purchasing should maximize value for taxpayers, not advance environmental policy—that requires legislation. The vague 'equal' standard invites arbitrary enforcement and regulatory capture, while compliance costs ultimately fall on taxpayers and reduce competition without proven commensurate benefits.

keep PART 2822—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS 48-CFR-2822 · 2022
Summary

Internal DOJ procurement procedures implementing FAR clauses related to labor standards, equal employment opportunity, and contractor oversight on DOJ premises. Establishes approval chains, reporting requirements, and designations of authority for various compliance determinations.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without this because it ensures proper oversight of contractors working on DOJ premises regarding critical matters like workplace safety (domestic violence policies), wage-hour compliance, and equal employment opportunity. The specified approval chains and reporting ensure accountability and prevent regulatory capture in enforcement. Achieving these outcomes without such procedural rules would be difficult given the complexity of federal contracting and the need to layer congressionally-mandated FAR requirements onto individual agency operations.

keep PART 2819—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS 48-CFR-2819 · 2022
Summary

Specifies that the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) or Head of Contracting Authority (HCA) acts as the agency head for specific FAR sections governing small business set-asides, programs, and size determinations.

Reason

Deletion would create uncertainty over who holds authority for small business contracting decisions, leading to inconsistent rulings, delays, and legal challenges that disrupt procurement and harm small businesses relying on predictable processes.

delete PART 2817—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 48-CFR-2817 · 2022
Summary

Regulation designates the Special Procurement Executive (SPE) as agency head for certain FAR purposes and specifies approval authority for deviation requests from 5-year contract limitations.

Reason

This internal procedural rule adds marginal bureaucratic complexity without serving a compelling public interest. Its elimination would reduce administrative overhead and simplify the regulatory code, with negligible risk of harm as authority determinations could be handled through informal channels.

keep PART 2816—TYPES OF CONTRACTS 48-CFR-2816 · 2022
Summary

Internal DOJ contracting procedures clarifying approval authority for exceptions to fair opportunity, designating ombudsmen for dispute resolution, and applying contract limitations to labor-hour contracts.

Reason

Maintains minimal procedural safeguards to ensure fair competition in government contracting and provides contractors with a dispute resolution mechanism. Removal could increase arbitrary decision-making and favoritism, undermining competitive bidding that benefits taxpayers.

keep PART 2815—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 48-CFR-2815 · 2022
Summary

DOJ internal regulation setting procedures for unsolicited proposals, requiring warranties from offerors to prevent unfair advantages under FAR 15.604, designating points of contact, and mandating OIG notification for audit requests.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without this as it prevents corruption and biased contracting in DOJ, safeguarding taxpayer funds. The standardized warranty and oversight mechanisms ensure fair competition and accountability in ways ad-hoc policies cannot reliably replicate.

keep PART 2814—SEALED BIDDING 48-CFR-2814 · 2022
Summary

Delegates authority to the Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) for making determinations on mistakes in bids under FAR 14.407-3 and 14.407-4, requiring coordination with legal counsel and establishing procedures for submitting advance decision requests to the Comptroller General, including specific documentation requirements.

Reason

Deletion would create inconsistent handling of bid mistakes, generating legal uncertainty for contractors and increasing costly protests and litigation. The minimal procedural requirements ensure fairness, proper documentation, and coordinated legal review—mechanisms that protect both government integrity and the rights of American businesses competing for federal contracts.

keep PART 2813—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES 48-CFR-2813 · 2022
Summary

Regulation establishes the certified invoice procedure for micro-purchases by the Department of Justice (DOJ), specifying conditions (domestic source, fund availability), verification steps, delegation authority, and clarifies agency head thresholds. It also permits non-standard forms and fast payment for utilities.

Reason

Deleting this rule would force DOJ to use more cumbersome purchase order procedures for micro-purchases, increasing administrative costs and delaying acquisitions, thereby wasting taxpayer dollars. The rule provides explicit authority for a streamlined, controlled process that balances efficiency with accountability; replicating it without the rule would create inconsistency, potential non-compliance with FAR, and require agencies to develop their own redundant procedures.

delete PART 2812—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS 48-CFR-2812 · 2022
Summary

Regulation mandates that Justice Department contracting officers include specific contract clauses (JAR 2852.212-4) in all commercial item solicitations and contracts that require FAR 52.212-4. Establishes waiver approval authority: HCA for individual contracts, SPE for class waivers, under FAR 12.302(c).

Reason

Internal administrative rule imposing negligible public burden; delegation of waiver authority duplicates existing FAR framework without adding value. Creates unnecessary bureaucratic layer with compliance costs that exceed any marginal benefit from redundancy. Federal procurement should follow uniform FAR standards without agency-specific mandates that multiply complexity without improving outcomes.

delete PART 2811—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS 48-CFR-2811 · 2022
Summary

This DOJ regulation implements FAR policies: (1) mandates metric system as preferred for DOJ solicitations/contracts, (2) requires sustainability policies in acquisitions, and (3) delegates certain FAR authorities to the HCA or designee.

Reason

Imposes compliance costs on contractors with negligible benefit; metric mandate forces conversion from customary units used by American businesses, creating training and conversion burdens that distort procurement decisions; exemplifies bureaucratic micromanagement that Hayek warned against—central planners imposing uniform solutions on complex processes where voluntary coordination or simple disclosure would suffice. Small businesses bear disproportionate costs, raising barriers to entry. No evidence of rights violations or market failures requiring correction.