Browse regulations

This regulation establishes procedures for individuals seeking executive clemency (pardon, commutation, reprieve) from the President, including petition requirements, filing locations, waiting periods (5 years for pardons), victim notification provisions for felonies, investigation protocols, and special procedures for death penalty cases. It explicitly states the rules are advisory and create no enforceable rights, preserving presidential discretion.

Deleting this regulation would not increase liberty; it would create administrative chaos and reduce transparency in the pardon process. The regulation provides predictable, fair procedures for petitioners and victims while preserving the President's plenary constitutional authority. The minimal compliance costs affect only a tiny number of applicants, far below the $14,000/household threshold of problematic regulations, and serve legitimate government interests in orderly administration and victim notification.

This regulation establishes procedures for assessing civil fines against Indian gaming operators for violations of gaming regulations, with fines up to $65,655 per violation based on factors like economic benefit, seriousness, violation history, negligence, and good faith efforts to comply.

This regulation creates a federal enforcement mechanism that imposes significant compliance costs on tribal gaming operations, potentially exceeding $65,655 per violation. The federal oversight extends beyond constitutional bounds, as gaming regulation traditionally falls under state and tribal jurisdiction. The complex assessment procedures and potential for multiple violations create regulatory uncertainty that disproportionately burdens small tribal operations while failing to achieve any compelling federal interest.

NIGC enforcement regulation establishing graduated process from letters of concern to temporary closures for Indian gaming violations, with appeal rights.

Imposes costly federal oversight on tribal gaming operations, diverting resources from tribal economic development. The unseen costs include barriers to entry for small operators, regulatory capture risks, and erosion of tribal sovereignty. Fraud prevention and safety can be better achieved through tribal self-governance and existing legal frameworks without this bureaucratic layer.

This regulation establishes procedures for the National Indian Gaming Commission to monitor and investigate Indian gaming operations, including inspection rights, record-keeping requirements, subpoena authority, and audit standards for tribal gaming facilities.

Federal oversight of tribal gaming operations represents unconstitutional federal overreach into areas that should be governed by tribal sovereignty and state compacts. The compliance costs and regulatory burden distort tribal economic development and create unnecessary federal bureaucracy.

Requires background investigations for all individuals and entities with 10%+ financial interest or management responsibility in Class II Indian gaming contracts. Mandates extensive personal information (SSN, fingerprints, 10-year history, financial statements) and $10,000-$25,000 deposits. Chairman must approve/disapprove contracts based on disqualifying factors.

The regulation imposes direct costs ($10,000-$25,000 deposits per party plus investigation expenses) and substantial compliance burdens (30-day response times, invasive documentation). Unseen effects include barriers to entry that protect incumbent firms, chilling qualified participants who refuse such scrutiny, and federal administrative overreach into tribal sovereign contracting. Tribes have strong incentives to vet contractors themselves; market mechanisms (reputation, bonding) provide natural screening without violating freedom of contract or imposing a hidden tax on tribal economic development.

Regulation outlines the process for tribes to amend management contracts for class II or class III gaming activities, including submission requirements, approval timelines, and conditions for disapproval. It also covers the assignment of management contracts and the Chairman's authority to modify or void contracts.

This regulation imposes unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles on tribal gaming operations, increasing compliance costs and delaying contract amendments. The Chairman's extensive approval and disapproval powers, along with the detailed submission requirements, create a burdensome process that hinders efficient management and can lead to regulatory capture. The regulation's complexity and potential for delay outweigh any benefits, making it a candidate for deletion.

Federal regulation requiring Indian tribes to obtain Chairman approval for gaming management contracts, with extensive documentation and 180-270 day review period, and specifying grounds for disapproval based on character and conduct of contractors.

Imposes substantial compliance costs and delays on tribal economic development, stifles competition by favoring established operators, increases consumer costs, infringes on tribal sovereignty, and creates regulatory capture risk—all unnecessary as tribes can self-regulate through their own governance.

Federal regulation requiring NIGC approval and imposing mandatory terms on tribal gaming management contracts, including prescribed responsibilities, accounting standards, fee caps (30-40% of net revenues), and five-year term limits.

Violates contractual freedom between sovereign tribes and private managers, imposing costly bureaucratic oversight and rigid fee caps that distort incentives. The compliance burden and approval delays create barriers to efficient gaming operations while failing to respect tribal sovereignty.

Requires tribes, management contractors, and tribal operators to designate an agent for receiving official notices from the Commission, and outlines multiple methods (in-person, mail, fax) for serving legal notices related to gaming operations. Also mandates transmission of notices to tribal officials, independent of service completion.

This regulation imposes administrative overhead on tribal entities with no observable public benefit that justifies federal intrusion into internal tribal governance. Notice service is adequately handled by state and tribal courts under existing legal frameworks, and federal compulsion here reflects regulatory overreach. It violates federalism by micromanaging tribal administrative procedures under the guise of gaming oversight, and its procedural details are obsolete in the age of digital communication and legal service standards already codified in state and tribal law.

Displays control numbers and expiration dates for information collection requirements of the National Indian Gaming Commission assigned by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Imposes bureaucratic compliance costs on Native American gaming operations while providing no meaningful public benefit; creates regulatory burden without addressing market failures or protecting consumers.

This regulation implements the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, defining jurisdiction over Class I, II, and III gaming on Indian lands. Class I is exclusively tribal, Class II is tribal-regulated but subject to federal oversight, and Class III is subject to tribal-state compacts that may override tribal authority.

The regulation entrenches federal overreach into inherently tribal matters, creates regulatory complexity through overlapping jurisdictions, and imposes state influence via compacts that undermine tribal sovereignty. Tribal self-governance under the Tenth Amendment and inherent sovereign authority are sufficient to regulate gaming without federal interference. The $2T regulatory burden includes enforcement costs borne by tribes and taxpayers, with no demonstrable benefit to public welfare beyond protecting state gambling monopolies.

Implements the Archaeological Resources Protection Act for Bureau of Indian Affairs lands, establishing permit requirements for excavating archaeological resources on Indian lands, with provisions for tribal consultation, consent from landowners, and protections for cultural items including human remains and sacred objects.

Imposes excessive federal bureaucracy on Indian lands, requiring permits and federal oversight for archaeological work that could be handled by tribes themselves, with $2+ trillion in compliance costs and regulatory capture risks outweighing any benefit.

Regulation establishes Courts of Indian Offenses, a federal judiciary for Indian Country where tribes lack their own courts, detailing jurisdiction, structure, procedures, and a substantive criminal code.

It imposes a costly federal bureaucracy that undermines tribal sovereignty and self-determination, discouraging tribes from establishing their own courts while enforcing a rigid criminal code that may conflict with tribal customs and produce unintended consequences; this expansion of federal power contradicts limited government principles.

The Supportive Housing Program provides grants for acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction, leasing, and operating costs of supportive housing and supportive services for homeless persons

The program's costs and bureaucratic complexity may outweigh its benefits, and its goals could be achieved through more efficient and effective means, such as private sector initiatives or state and local government programs

The Shelter Plus Care (S+C) program provides rental assistance and supportive services to homeless individuals with disabilities, including those with mental illness, substance abuse issues, or AIDS. Administered by HUD, it requires matching rental aid with equivalent supportive services value and prioritizes permanent housing solutions over temporary shelter.

Program duplicates existing HUD homeless assistance efforts while adding bureaucratic complexity. Federal rental assistance programs already target disabled homeless populations through Section 8 vouchers and other mechanisms. The $2 trillion annual regulatory compliance burden on Americans makes eliminating redundant housing bureaucracy a fiscal necessity.