← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

delete PART 31—PURCHASE OF WOOL AND WOOL TOP SAMPLES 7-CFR-31 · 1997
Summary

USDA certification program selling wool and wool top grade samples with application requirements, fees, and inspection provisions

Reason

Creates unnecessary government monopoly on grading standards; private sector could provide equivalent certification services more efficiently without taxpayer-funded administration, reducing costs and bureaucratic burden on wool industry.

delete PART 17—SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES MADE AVAILABLE UNDER TITLE I OF THE AGRICULTURAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED 7-CFR-17 · 1997
Summary

Regulations governing CCC export financing of U.S. agricultural commodities under Pub. L. 480 (Food for Peace). Establishes procedures for foreign governments or private entities to obtain government financing for commodity purchases and ocean transportation, including eligibility requirements, contracting rules, agent approvals, and payment restrictions.

Reason

This is not a proper regulation but a corporate welfare program that uses taxpayer money to subsidize agricultural exports, distorting free market competition and creating dependency. The administrative bureaucracy imposes hidden costs while benefiting special interests. Food aid and market development should be handled by private charity and market forces, not government financing that picks winners and losers in international trade.

keep PART 7101—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 5-CFR-7101 · 1997
Summary

NLRB ethics regulation requiring employees to obtain written approval before outside employment, including detailed disclosures of employer, work nature, duration, and compensation; defines employment broadly but excludes uncompensated nonprofit activities; mandates written disqualification notices when recusing from matters due to conflicts.

Reason

Without this, NLRB employees could have financial conflicts influencing labor dispute outcomes, distorting markets and undermining rule of law; the minor compliance burden prevents far greater hidden costs of corruption and biased decision-making.

keep PART 3801—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 5-CFR-3801 · 1997
Summary

This regulation establishes ethical conduct rules for Department of Justice employees, including restrictions on gifts, outside employment, and financial interests; special rules for FBI/DEA agents, ATF employees, and forfeited property purchases; and waiver procedures. It supplements broader federal ethics standards with DOJ-specific provisions to prevent conflicts of interest and maintain impartiality.

Reason

Without these rules, DOJ officials could exploit their positions: buying forfeited assets with insider knowledge, practicing law on matters the DOJ handles, profiting from industries they regulate, and accepting gifts from regulated parties. This would create systemic corruption, weaponized prosecutions, and a captured justice department that serves powerful interests rather than the rule of law—directly undermining free enterprise by enabling government to be bought. The compliance burden is minimal compared to the catastrophic cost of a corrupt DOJ that can selectively enforce laws and sell justice to the highest bidder.

delete PART 3501—SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 5-CFR-3501 · 1997
Summary

Department of Interior ethics regulations establishing gift rules, conflict of interest prohibitions, and outside employment restrictions for federal employees

Reason

Bureaucratic compliance costs exceed benefits - these rules create a compliance labyrinth that no employee can fully comprehend while failing to prevent actual corruption, which is better addressed through transparency and criminal penalties

delete PART 2423—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS 5-CFR-2423 · 1997
Summary

FLRA unfair labor practice procedures covering charge filing, investigation, settlement, and hearing processes for federal labor disputes

Reason

Creates unnecessary federal bureaucracy for labor disputes that should be handled through private arbitration or state systems, imposing compliance costs and regulatory complexity without constitutional authority

keep PART 1651—DEATH BENEFITS 5-CFR-1651 · 1997
Summary

Regulation establishes detailed rules for distributing Thrift Savings Plan death benefits to beneficiaries of deceased federal employees, including order of precedence, beneficiary designation requirements, special rules for spouses/children/parents/estates, handling of contested claims, lost beneficiaries, disclaimers, and beneficiary participant account operations.

Reason

Americans would be worse off if deleted: federal employees' families would face uncertainty and potential loss of benefits; orderly distribution would break down; disputes would increase dramatically. Hard to do otherwise: the detailed administrative framework is essential for handling the complex myriad of real-world scenarios (simultaneous death, homicide, missing beneficiaries, multiple accounts, trusts, etc.) that would require case-by-case adjudication without predictable rules. These internal government program rules don't burden the public but ensure the TSP can fulfill its statutory obligations reliably.

delete PART 1639—CLAIMS COLLECTION 5-CFR-1639 · 1997
Summary

Regulations governing debt collection procedures for the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, including salary offsets, interest penalties, administrative costs, credit reporting, and private collection contractor use for debts owed to the Thrift Savings Plan or other federal agencies.

Reason

Creates bureaucratic debt collection apparatus that imposes excessive administrative costs and penalties on federal employees, with complex procedures that benefit collection agencies over debtors while potentially violating due process rights.

keep PART 1312—CLASSIFICATION, DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION AND SAFEGUARDING OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION 5-CFR-1312 · 1997
Summary

This regulation establishes procedures for classifying, declassifying, marking, storing, and transmitting national security information within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It designates classification authority, outlines classification levels (Top Secret, Secret, Confidential), specifies marking requirements, and mandates security protocols including accountability controls, access restrictions, and annual Top Secret inventories. All procedures are based on Executive Order 12958 and apply to OMB employees handling classified material.

Reason

Protecting genuinely sensitive national security information—military plans, intelligence sources, foreign government data, and nuclear programs—is a core, constitutionally legitimate function of the federal government. These procedures ensure that information requiring protection is properly identified, marked, controlled, and declassified when no longer sensitive. The regulation prevents unauthorized disclosure that could endanger lives or national interests, and its compliance burden is limited to a small subset of federal employees with security clearances who work with classified material. While classification systems risk overuse, having standardized, accountable procedures is essential; the unseen cost of deletion would be chaotic, unprotected dissemination of information whose compromise would cause real damage to national security.

keep PART 1305—RELEASE OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION, AND TESTIMONY BY OMB PERSONNEL AS WITNESSES, IN LITIGATION 5-CFR-1305 · 1997
Summary

OMB internal regulation setting procedures for responding to subpoenas or other legal demands for agency materials or information. Requires General Counsel approval before any employee produces documents or discloses information, mandates immediate notification, and requires affidavit of relevance when OMB is not a party. Provides for protective court appearances and allows employees to respectfully decline non-stayed demands contrary to General Counsel instructions.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without it: inconsistent handling of legal demands could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive government information, undermining agency deliberations and increasing litigation risks. Hard to replicate otherwise because centralized legal oversight through the General Counsel ensures uniform application of privileges and protections across all demands, avoiding ad hoc decisions by individual employees lacking legal expertise.

delete PART 870—FEDERAL EMPLOYEES' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM 5-CFR-870 · 1997
Summary

Regulation establishing the Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) program, which provides group life insurance (Basic and Optional coverage) to federal employees, retirees, and compensationers. It defines eligibility, coverage calculations (linked to annual pay), premium sharing (government pays one-third of Basic), accidental death/dismemberment benefits, and extensive administrative procedures for enrollment, beneficiaries, corrections, and reconsiderations.

Reason

FEGLI uses taxpayer subsidies to provide a benefit that should be purchased privately, distorting labor markets by making federal employment artificially attractive and crowding out private insurance competition. The program contributes to the $2 trillion regulatory burden through complex rules and a dedicated bureaucracy, while violating limited government principles. Unseen costs include reduced portability, suppressed innovation in group life products, and the moral hazard of government-guaranteed benefits fostering dependency.

delete PART 178—PROCEDURES FOR SETTLING CLAIMS 5-CFR-178 · 1997
Summary

OPM regulation prescribing detailed procedures for settling claims against the US related to deceased federal employees' compensation and veterans' benefits, including claim submission, statute of limitations, burden of proof, and order of precedence for payment distribution.

Reason

Imposes significant bureaucratic complexity and compliance costs on grieving families and federal agencies. The underlying statutes already mandate payment; this detailed procedural overlay is not essential and could be replaced by simpler agency guidance or standard estate administration, eliminating hidden tax burdens and reducing the regulatory labyrinth.

keep PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA 50-CFR-679 · 1996
Summary

Federal regulations governing commercial fishing in Alaska's Exclusive Economic Zone, implementing fishery management plans, individual fishing quotas (IFQs), license limitations, observer programs, and community development quotas to prevent overfishing and ensure sustainability of fish stocks.

Reason

Deletion would cause collapse of fish stocks through the tragedy of the commons, destroying a multi-billion dollar industry, coastal communities, and America's seafood supply. The IFQ system creates tradable property rights that align economic incentives with conservation—a market-based approach that prevents a destructive race to fish.

delete PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES 50-CFR-660 · 1996
Summary

This CFR part governs U.S. fishing vessels in the EEZ off Washington, Oregon, and California under the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan. It defines fishing gears, establishes catch specifications (ABC, ACL, ACT), creates multiple conservation area closures (RCAs, GCAs, EFHCAs, DECAs), bans directed commercial fishing for 12 'Shared EC Species,' imposes extensive reporting and monitoring requirements, and recognizes tribal fishing rights.

Reason

This regulation imposes crushing compliance costs—estimated at thousands per vessel annually—while federalizing what the Tenth Amendment reserves to states. It creates formidable barriers to entry protecting incumbent fishing operations, micromanages through thousands of prescriptive rules that stifle innovation, and generates chronic uncertainty from complex, ever-changing requirements. The unseen costs include lost fishing opportunity, distorted investment decisions, regulatory capture by industry insiders on the Council, and the impossibility of citizens knowing all 185,000+ pages of rules. Sustainable fisheries could be achieved more efficiently through state-managed individual transferable quotas that create property rights, harness market incentives, and respect constitutional federalism.

delete PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES 50-CFR-648 · 1996
Summary

Federal regulation governing conservation and management of multiple Northeastern U.S. fisheries including Atlantic mackerel, squid, butterfish, salmon, scallops, surfclams, ocean quahogs, and various groundfish species. Implements fishery management plans through detailed definitions, catch limits, gear restrictions, and monitoring requirements.

Reason

This regulation creates a complex federal bureaucracy that micromanages fishing operations, imposes $2+ trillion in compliance costs, and violates constitutional federalism by federalizing fisheries management that should be handled by states. The extensive regulatory framework distorts market incentives, raises barriers to entry for small fishing operations, and creates regulatory capture opportunities while failing to achieve its conservation goals more efficiently than market-based alternatives.