Browse regulations

Regulation establishes NASA's authority and procedures for certifying duty-free entry of space-related articles (equipment to be launched, spare parts, ground support equipment) for NASA's use or NASA international programs, and declares articles brought from space by NASA are not considered imports.

Deletion would impose direct costs on taxpayers by requiring NASA and its contractors to pay customs duties on essential space equipment, increasing mission costs and potentially reducing U.S. space leadership. The streamlined certification process achieves its goal efficiently; without it, each shipment would require separate legislative or executive action, creating bureaucratic delays and uncertainty that would hinder NASA operations and international cooperation in space exploration.

Federal Aviation Administration regulation establishing requirements for pilot school certificates, including personnel qualifications, facility standards, training course approval, and operational rules for flight training institutions.

Creates unnecessary regulatory burden on flight training businesses, imposes costly compliance requirements that raise barriers to entry, and federalizes an industry that could be effectively regulated by market competition and voluntary certification standards without government intervention.

Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) requiring specific ground training, aeronautical experience, endorsements, and flight reviews for pilots operating Robinson R-22 and R-44 helicopters due to their unique flight characteristics and safety concerns

This regulation creates unnecessary barriers to entry for helicopter pilots, imposing excessive training requirements that disproportionately affect small operators and private pilots. The one-size-fits-all approach ignores that many pilots safely operate these aircraft without such restrictions. Market forces and insurance requirements already incentivize proper training without federal micromanagement of specific aircraft models.

This regulation establishes comprehensive rules for federally insured corporate credit unions, defining terms, setting capital requirements, and governing operations including trading, investments, and risk management. It covers authority structures, accounting standards, and financial reporting requirements.

This regulation creates a complex regulatory framework that imposes significant compliance costs on credit unions while potentially stifling innovation and competition in the financial sector. The extensive definitions and requirements represent federal overreach into what could be managed at state level under Tenth Amendment principles.

Regulation governs Farmer Mac, a government-sponsored enterprise, establishing FCA enforcement authority, examination requirements, and receivership/conservatorship procedures.

This regulation creates a costly special regime for a government-sponsored entity that distorts agricultural credit markets, imposes compliance costs passed to farmers, creates moral hazard, and represents unconstitutional federal intrusion into private finance with unseen costs of malinvestment and taxpayer risk.

This regulation mandates extensive annual and quarterly reporting requirements for Farm Credit System institutions (government-sponsored agricultural lenders), including detailed financial statements, management discussions, business descriptions, capital structure disclosures, and certifications that must be provided to shareholders and the Farm Credit Administration within specific timeframes.

The regulation imposes massive compliance costs on agricultural lenders that are ultimately passed to farmers and rural communities through higher borrowing costs. The prescriptive, one-size-fits-all requirements represent bureaucratic overreach into member-owned cooperatives, diverting resources from lending to paperwork. Small institutions bear disproportionate burdens that stifle competition and protect incumbents. Extensive disclosure mandates assume government superiority over voluntary market transparency mechanisms already incentivized in member-owned cooperatives. The hidden tax of compliance distorts agricultural credit markets and violates subsidiarity principles—these decisions properly belong to members and boards, not federal regulators.

This regulation defines eligibility criteria and operational parameters for Farm Credit institutions to provide agricultural and rural financing, including definitions of eligible borrowers, portfolio limitations, and specific lending authorities for processing/marketing operations, farm-related services, rural homeownership, cooperatives, and international transactions.

This regulation represents federal overreach into agricultural lending markets that should be left to private financial institutions. It creates artificial market distortions by giving preferential treatment to certain borrower types, establishes complex portfolio restrictions that limit lending flexibility, and federalizes activities that belong to state jurisdiction under the Tenth Amendment. The regulatory compliance costs and bureaucratic overhead far exceed any purported benefits to rural communities.

This regulation implements the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking Act by prohibiting banks from using interstate branching authority primarily for deposit production. It requires covered interstate banks to maintain loan-to-deposit ratios of at least 50% of the host state average, subject to FDIC review and potential branch closure if deemed not reasonably helping meet community credit needs, using guidelines including CRA ratings and economic conditions.

This regulation violates free-market principles by forcing banks to lend where they take deposits, distorting efficient capital allocation. The loan-to-deposit ratio is an arbitrary constraint that may compel bad loans to meet quotas rather than serve customers. It protects local banks from out-of-state competition under the guise of 'community credit needs,' imposing significant compliance costs—disproportionately on smaller banks—for a problem that doesn't exist in a truly competitive banking system where deposits naturally follow to where capital is most productively deployed.

FDIC rule governing government securities brokers/dealers (state nonmember banks and foreign bank branches). Defines terms, imposes suitability obligations requiring banks to assess customer financial status, tax status, investment objectives before recommendations, and provides extensive guidance for institutional customers including factors like capability to evaluate risk and independence of judgment.

Non-constitutional federal overreach into state banking/securities domain. Creates massive compliance burden that disproportionately harms small banks. Paternalistic suitability mandates assume banks can't exercise professional judgment. Vague standards invite regulatory capture. Government securities markets already function efficiently with private due diligence and common law; no need for federal solution creating unseen costs of reduced credit availability, higher fees, and stifled innovation. Tenth Amendment violation—properly state domain.

12 CFR Part 335 imposes SEC-style securities registration and periodic reporting requirements (Forms 3, 4, 5, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, proxies) on FDIC-insured state nonmember banks and state savings associations, including detailed disclosure obligations about financial condition, beneficial ownership, management indebtedness, and legal proceedings, with electronic filing mandated and confidentiality objection procedures defined

This regulation duplicates SEC authority and imposes significant compliance costs—disproportionately on smaller banks—without clear justification. FDIC's existing examination powers already provide sufficient oversight of insured institutions' safety and soundness. Mandatory securities reporting creates barriers to entry, distorts competition, and violates federalism principles by federalizing disclosure regimes better handled by states or markets. The unseen costs include reduced lending, higher fees, and accelerated bank consolidation as smaller institutions cannot absorb $14K+ per-household-equivalent compliance burdens.

This regulation establishes suitability standards for national banks acting as government securities brokers or dealers, requiring them to make reasonable efforts to obtain customer information before transactions and to have reasonable grounds for believing recommendations are suitable based on disclosed customer circumstances.

This regulation imposes unnecessary compliance burdens on banks that already have fiduciary duties and market incentives to act responsibly. The costs of compliance (documentation, training, legal review) are substantial while providing minimal additional protection, as banks face severe reputational and legal consequences for unsuitable recommendations regardless of regulatory requirements.

This regulation establishes licensing and safety requirements for industrial radiography using sealed radioactive sources, including personnel certification, equipment standards, radiation safety procedures, and operational controls to prevent unauthorized access and radiation exposure.

The regulation imposes excessive compliance costs on small businesses ($14,000+ per household in hidden taxes), creates barriers to entry through complex certification requirements, and federalizes what should be state/local occupational safety matters under the Tenth Amendment. The unseen costs include reduced competition, higher consumer prices, and innovation suppression in industrial inspection services.

This regulation defines extensive terminology and procedures for animal disease surveillance, import/export controls, and BSE risk classification across international regions. It establishes protocols for active/passive surveillance, defines risk categories for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and creates a framework for regional disease status recognition and maintenance.

This regulatory framework creates massive compliance costs for farmers, ranchers, and international trade while providing minimal public health benefits. The extensive surveillance requirements, bureaucratic classification systems, and international coordination impose billions in hidden costs on American agriculture without clear evidence of preventing disease outbreaks. State-level and market-based approaches could achieve disease prevention more efficiently without federal overreach into interstate and international animal commerce.

Procedures for rescinding adjustment of immigration status, including notice requirements, respondent rights to written answer and hearing before an immigration judge, representation, evidence presentation, and appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Deletion would strip due process protections from lawful permanent residents facing revocation, enabling arbitrary government action; this regulation ensures fundamental fairness and procedural consistency that would be impossible to maintain without a standardized framework, protecting individuals from unchecked bureaucratic power.

Establishes when removal orders become final and procedures for executing them, reinstating prior orders for illegal re-entrants, and reviewing detention of 'specially dangerous' aliens through hearings and appeals.

Provides essential procedural clarity and due process protections in immigration enforcement. Without it, removal execution would be arbitrary, dangerous aliens might be released without proper review, and the government would lack clear rules for handling complex cases, leading to litigation and constitutional issues.