← Back to overview

Browse regulations

Search, filter, and sort all reviewed regulations.

keep PART 160—GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 45-CFR-160 · 2000
Summary

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) establishes national standards for protecting sensitive patient health information, covering health plans, providers, and clearinghouses, with specific requirements for electronic transactions, privacy, and security of protected health information.

Reason

Americans would be worse off without HIPAA as it prevents unauthorized disclosure of medical records, protects patient privacy, and establishes baseline security standards that would be difficult to achieve through market mechanisms alone, especially given the sensitive nature of health information and the power imbalance between patients and health care providers.

delete PART 19—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 44-CFR-19 · 2000
Summary

Regulation implements Title IX by prohibiting sex discrimination in any education program receiving federal financial assistance, covering admissions, treatment, and employment; requires self-evaluations, grievance procedures, and notifications; includes exemptions for religious orgs, military training, and certain single-sex orgs; provides transition plans for formerly single-sex institutions.

Reason

Imposes heavy compliance costs, especially on small institutions; centralizes education policy in violation of federalism; uses federal funding as coercion; creates bureaucratic overreach with unintended consequences like campus due process violations and administrative bloat; stifles innovation and voluntary association.

keep PART 6300—MANAGEMENT OF DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS 43-CFR-6300 · 2000
Summary

Manages BLM wilderness areas under the Wilderness Act, preserving wilderness character while allowing specific permitted uses and access rights, with detailed prohibitions on motorized activities and commercial development.

Reason

Americans would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it preserves irreplaceable wilderness areas that provide ecological benefits, recreation opportunities, and natural heritage that cannot be replicated through market mechanisms. The regulation achieves its desired outcome by balancing preservation with necessary access rights through carefully defined exceptions and permit processes.

delete PART 428—INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN FARM OPERATIONS IN EXCESS OF 960 ACRES AND THE ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FORMERLY EXCESS LAND 43-CFR-428 · 2000
Summary

This regulation addresses Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (RRA) forms requirements for certain farm operators and the eligibility of formerly excess land that is operated by a farm operator who was the landowner of that land when it was excess.

Reason

The regulation imposes ongoing compliance costs on farmers while achieving little marginal benefit, as the original land consolidation objectives have largely been met. It perpetuates federal bureaucracy, creates disproportionate burdens on small operators, and represents unconstitutional federal overreach into state agricultural land use. The complex forms and eligibility requirements waste resources and invite regulatory capture, benefitting large agribusiness at taxpayers' expense.

delete PART 41—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 43-CFR-41 · 2000
Summary

Federal regulation implementing Title IX to eliminate sex-based discrimination in education programs receiving federal financial assistance, covering admissions, employment, athletics, and grievance procedures with specific exemptions for religious institutions and single-sex organizations

Reason

This regulation represents federal overreach into education policy that should be left to states and institutions. It creates costly compliance burdens, enables bureaucratic mission creep, and imposes one-size-fits-all mandates that distort educational choices. The stated goal of eliminating sex discrimination could be achieved through existing civil rights laws without this extensive federal framework that undermines institutional autonomy and free association.

keep PART 457—ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES 42-CFR-457 · 2000
Summary

Federal grants to states for child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children under Title XXI of Social Security Act, with states determining eligibility, benefits, and administration within federal guidelines.

Reason

Provides essential health coverage to millions of uninsured children who would otherwise lack access to care, preventing medical bankruptcy and ensuring preventive services that reduce long-term healthcare costs.

delete PART 419—PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES 42-CFR-419 · 2000
Summary

Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) establishes predetermined payment rates for designated outpatient services using APC groups, with packaged costs for procedures and services, excluding certain education and training costs, and applies to most Medicare-participating hospitals except specified categories like CAHs and Maryland hospitals.

Reason

This complex federal regulation creates a massive bureaucratic system that distorts healthcare markets, increases costs through administrative overhead, and prevents price competition. It exemplifies federal overreach into healthcare that should be handled by states or the free market.

delete PART 70—INTERSTATE QUARANTINE 42-CFR-70 · 2000
Summary

Comprehensive CDC regulations governing quarantine, isolation, and conditional release of individuals with quarantinable communicable diseases, including definitions, procedures for apprehension, medical examinations, travel restrictions, and due process rights.

Reason

Creates massive federal overreach into personal liberty and interstate travel rights, enabling indefinite detention without clear limits, imposing compliance costs on businesses and individuals, and centralizing powers that properly belong to states under Tenth Amendment.

delete PART 1400—DISTRIBUTION OF OFF-SITE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS INFORMATION 40-CFR-1400 · 2000
Summary

This regulation governs public and government access to chemical accident risk management plans, restricting dissemination of off-site consequence analysis information while providing limited reading-room access and computer-based indicators for vulnerable zone information.

Reason

Creates a complex bureaucratic system that restricts public access to safety information while failing to address the root cause - chemical plant safety. The regulation imposes significant compliance costs on businesses, creates information asymmetry, and violates transparency principles by criminalizing the sharing of public safety data that could help communities prepare for emergencies.

delete PART 445—LANDFILLS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY 40-CFR-445 · 2000
Summary

40 CFR Part 445 sets technology-based effluent limitations for wastewater discharges from landfill units, regulating pollutants including ammonia, BOD5, arsenic, chromium, zinc, naphthalene, phenol, aniline, benzoic acid, p-cresol, pyridine, and a-terpineol. It applies to hazardous waste and municipal solid waste landfills with numerous exceptions for industrial facilities, POTW discharges, and certain wastewater streams.

Reason

Federal command-and-control regulation imposes significant hidden costs through mandated monitoring, testing, and technology, raising barriers to entry for small landfills and reducing competition. Rigid standards stifle innovation and prevent site-specific cost optimization, while federal overreach into local land use erodes constitutional federalism. Complex exemption rules create compliance uncertainty and regulatory capture opportunities.

delete PART 444—WASTE COMBUSTORS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY 40-CFR-444 · 2000
Summary

EPA regulation governing wastewater discharges from commercial hazardous waste combustors (facilities burning off-site hazardous waste for profit). Sets effluent limitations for toxic heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, silver, titanium, zinc), TSS, and pH. Requires monitoring using EPA-approved test procedures and establishes pretreatment standards for indirect dischargers to POTWs.

Reason

This regulation duplicates state water quality standards and common law tort liability mechanisms that already provide adequate protection. The hidden compliance costs—laboratory certification, specialized testing, reporting bureaucracy—represent a classic regulatory capture artifact where EPA and approved method vendors benefit from mandatory incorporation by reference. Facilities burning hazardous waste for profit have strong incentives to avoid environmental liability and lawsuits; market discipline plus state enforcement of pollution violations would achieve cleaner outcomes without federal micromanagement of test methods and numeric limits that cannot account for local hydrological conditions.

delete PART 442—TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY 40-CFR-442 · 2000
Summary

This EPA regulation (40 CFR Part 442) governs wastewater discharges from facilities that clean interiors of tanks used to transport chemical, petroleum, or food-grade cargos. It applies to tank trucks, rail tank cars, intermodal tank containers, tank barges, and ocean/sea tankers, but excludes exterior-only cleaning, drums/IBCs/closed-top hoppers, and facilities discharging under 100,000 gallons/year. The rule sets technology-based effluent limitations (BPT, BCT, BAT) for pollutants including BOD5, TSS, oil/grease, heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, zinc), and organics (fluoranthene, phenanthrene). It also includes pretreatment standards for POTW discharges and offers an alternative 'Pollution Prevention Allowable Discharge' path requiring a comprehensive Pollutant Management Plan with extensive documentation, waste segregation, recycling provisions, and recordkeeping.

Reason

This regulation imposes substantial hidden compliance costs on the tank cleaning industry through rigid technology mandates and bureaucratic planning requirements. The one-size-fits-all effluent standards disregard the specific circumstances and dispersed knowledge of individual operators, violating Hayek's critique of centralized planning. The Pollutant Management Plan requirement creates a significant administrative burden, particularly harming small businesses with limited resources. These costs are ultimately passed to consumers and create barriers to entry that protect incumbent firms from competition. The rule represents federal overreach into what state water quality standards and tort law could address more efficiently, with far greater flexibility and innovation. Americans are worse off bearing these $14,000+ per household in cumulative regulatory costs for marginal environmental benefits that could be achieved through less coercive means.

delete PART 437—THE CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT POINT SOURCE CATEGORY 40-CFR-437 · 2000
Summary

This regulation establishes effluent limitations and standards for centralized waste treatment (CWT) facilities that handle hazardous and non-hazardous industrial wastes, including metal-bearing, oily, and organic wastes. It defines treatment categories, monitoring requirements, and exceptions for various waste types and treatment processes.

Reason

This represents federal overreach into waste treatment operations that should be handled through state tort law and property rights. The complex regulatory framework creates compliance costs exceeding benefits, distorts market incentives for proper waste disposal, and protects incumbent CWT facilities from competition through regulatory barriers.

delete PART 176—TIME-LIMITED TOLERANCES FOR EMERGENCY EXEMPTIONS 40-CFR-176 · 2000
Summary

EPA procedures for establishing temporary tolerances (maximum pesticide residue limits) for emergency or crisis pesticide use under FIFRA section 18, bypassing normal notice-and-comment rulemaking when urgent agricultural, public health, or quarantine needs arise.

Reason

Federal pre-approval for emergency pesticide use creates unnecessary regulatory uncertainty and compliance costs for farmers facing genuine crises. The vague 'reasonable certainty of no harm' standard expands bureaucratic discretion, invites regulatory capture, and centralizes authority over local agricultural decisions that belong to states. The emergency loophole undermines rule of law by exempting agencies from transparent rulemaking, while time-limited tolerances still require expensive applications and create barriers to rapid response.

delete PART 97—FEDERAL NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM, CAIR NOX AND SO2 TRADING PROGRAMS, CSAPR NOX AND SO2 TRADING PROGRAMS, AND TEXAS SO2 TRADING PROGRAM 40-CFR-97 · 2000
Summary

This EPA regulation establishes a federal cap-and-trade program for nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions from large fossil fuel-fired power plants and industrial boilers, with complex permitting, continuous monitoring requirements, and allowance trading designed to address interstate ozone transport under the Clean Air Act.

Reason

The program imposes substantial compliance costs and regulatory burden on energy producers, creates a federally managed emissions trading market that distorts economic signals, and represents federal overreach into energy policy that should remain with states. The unseen costs include higher energy prices for consumers, reduced competition from compliance burdens on smaller producers, and bureaucratic complexity that outweighs any marginal environmental benefit that could be achieved more efficiently through state coordination or market-based approaches without federal control.